| 摘要: |
| 粮食产后减损是补齐粮食安全短板和夯实粮食安全根基的重要举措。以元治理理论为指引,能够更好地剖析粮食产后损失治理中政府责任的理论逻辑和实践逻辑,推动粮食产后减损治理体系和治理能力现代化。从理论层面看,粮食产后减损具有外部性,难以依靠市场力量推动私人部门自觉减损,政府作为元治理主体,应当扮演减损治理体系的设计者、治理成本的承担者、治理标准的制定者、治理利益的协调者以及治理行动的引导者角色。然而现实中仍存在治理合力未形成、治理标准不成熟、治理手段不完善的困境,政府履责情况与理论逻辑存在差距。为此,进一步从实践层面构建政府作为元治理主体参与粮食产后减损的主要思路,分别是增加财政投入,以经济手段激励减损；加大考核力度,以行政手段引导减损；加快立法修规,以法律手段约束减损；组织宣传培训,以教育手段促进减损；开展国际合作,以经验交流推动减损。 |
| 关键词: 粮食产后减损 政府责任 理论逻辑 实践逻辑 元治理 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金管理科学部应急管理项目“我国粮食产后前端环节损失调查评估及节粮减损的总体思路研究（总课题）”（编号：72241015）；江苏社会科学基金项目“新发展格局下江苏粮食安全保障体系研究”（编号：21GLC007）；江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目“重大突发事件应对与粮食支持价格政策调节空间研究”（编号：2021SJA0273） |
|
| Construction of Government Responsibility for Post-production Loss of Grain from the Perspective of Meta-governance：Theory Logic and Practice Logic |
|
|
|
|
| Abstract: |
| Post-production loss reduction is an important measure to shore up the weak link and consolidate the foundation of food security. Guided by the meta-governance theory, we can analyze the theoretical logic and practical logic of government responsibility in the control of postpartum grain loss clearer and modernize the system and capacity for managing post-production grain loss. From the theoretical perspective, post-production loss of grain has externalities, and it is difficult to rely on market forces to promote the voluntary loss of private sector. Therefore, as the main body of meta-governance, the government should play the role of designer of the derogation governance system, undertaker of governance costs, maker of governance standards, coordinator of governance interests and guide of governance actions. However, in reality, there are still dilemmas of unformed governance forces, immature governance standards and imperfect governance means, and there is a gap between the government"s performance and the theoretical logic. Therefore, the main idea of government participating in post-production loss reduction of grain is further constructed from the practical level, such as increasing financial input to stimulate the impairment by economic means, increasing the strength of assessment by administrative means, speeding up legislation and amend regulations to restrict the derogation by legal means, organizing publicity and training to promote impairment through educational means, carrying out international cooperation to promote mitigation through exchange of experience. |
| Key words: Post-production loss reduction Government responsibility Theory logic Practice logic Meta-governance |