摘要: |
宅基地使用权退出和流转再利用是当前农村宅基地“三权分置”改革的重点内容。由区位属性衍生的“瓦片经济”,决定了大城市郊区宅基地退出和再利用具有与一般乡村不同的特征。通过对北京市首个农村宅基地制度改革试点——大兴区的实地访谈,深入分析其在宅基地退出和再利用过程中面临的一系列问题,结合区位异质性有针对性地提出大城市郊区宅基地退出和再利用优化路径,为城乡融合发展和农村宅基地“三权分置”改革实施差异化管理政策提供借鉴。研究表明:(1)相比较一般地区,大城市郊区的宅基地退出意愿较低,但再利用意愿强烈,并且优越的区位条件使得其在退出和再利用形式上具有更加多样化的选择;(2)大城市郊区宅基地退出和再利用问题的根源,既受我国农村土地制度安排路径依赖性的影响,又受其特殊区位的制约;(3)大城市郊区宅基地退出和再利用优化路径可围绕“制度建立,组织构建,思路转变,模式调整,形式差异化、多样化”的方向进行。 |
关键词: 三权分置 宅基地 区位异质性 退出和再利用 大城市郊区 |
DOI: |
分类号:F301.2 |
基金项目:国家社会科学基金(青年项目)“乡村振兴战略背景下农村宅基地使用权流转机制与差异化政策研究”(19CJY035) |
|
The Retreat and Reuse Optimization Paths of Rural Homestead in Urban Periphery under the Backdrop of Three-rights-separation Reform |
ZHAO Qian-yu1
|
1.School of Public Administration,Sichuan University,Sichuan Chengdu;2.School of Public Administration and Policy,Renmin University of China
|
Abstract: |
The retreat and reuse of rural homestead land use right is the key content of rural homestead land system reform. The “tile economy” derived from the location attribute determines that the exit and reuse of rural homestead in urban-rural fringe zones has different characteristics from the general rural areas. The purpose of this paper is to take Daxing District,the first pilot of rural homestead system reform in Beijing, as an example, analyze a series of problems and their causes and put forward targeted optimization paths from the perspective of location heterogeneity, thus providing references for the integration development of urban and rural areas and the three-rights-separation reform(ownership, tenure, and membership) of rural homestead system. The research results are as follows: (1) compared with general areas, rural households in the urban-rural fringe zones have a lower willingness to withdraw the land, while a stronger intention to reuse the land. What is more, the superior location of the urban-rural fringe zone makes it have more diversified choices in the forms of withdrawal and reuse the land. (2) Sources of the problems faced in the urban-rural fringe zones are not only affected by the path dependence of the institutional arrangement, but also by its special location.(3) Paths of improvement should focus on the direction of “institutional establishment, organizational construction, transformation of ideas, mode adjustment, form differentiation and diversification”. |
Key words: three-rights-separation reform rural homestead location heterogeneity retreat and reuse the urban-rural fringe zone |